Latest [Mar 28, 2026] Juniper JN0-664 Exam Practice Test To Gain Brilliante Result
Take a Leap Forward in Your Career by Earning Juniper JN0-664
NEW QUESTION # 54
Exhibit
Click the Exhibit button-Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct about BGP routes on R3 that are learned from the ISP-A neighbor? (Choose two.)
- A. All BGP attribute values must be removed before receiving the routes.
- B. By default, the next-hop value for these routes is not changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3.
- C. The BGP local-preference value that is used by ISP-A is not advertised to R3.
- D. The next-hop value for these routes is changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3.
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Analyzing the Exhibit
The diagram represents BGP peering between:
AS 65512 (Enterprise Network)
AS 65511 (ISP-A)
R3 and R4 are peering with ISP-A using EBGP.
R1, R2, R3, and R4 are peering within AS 65512 using IBGP.
Understanding BGP Route Behavior
Option A: "By default, the next-hop value for these routes is not changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3." ❌ Incorrect!
EBGP behavior: When a BGP route is advertised via EBGP, the next-hop IP is changed to the router's own IP by default.
Since ISP-A is advertising routes via EBGP to R3, the next-hop is changed to ISP-A's IP.
Thus, this statement is incorrect.
Option B: "The BGP local-preference value that is used by ISP-A is not advertised to R3." ✅ Correct!
BGP Local Preference (LOCAL_PREF) is an IBGP-only attribute.
Local Preference is NOT shared over EBGP because it is used within an AS to influence route selection.
ISP-A will not send LOCAL_PREF to R3, as R3 is in a different AS.
Thus, this statement is correct.
Option C: "All BGP attribute values must be removed before receiving the routes." ❌ Incorrect!
BGP does not remove all attributes when advertising routes. Some attributes are modified (e.g., next-hop, AS-PATH), but others (like MED, community) may be preserved.
Thus, this statement is incorrect.
Option D: "The next-hop value for these routes is changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3." ✅ Correct!
As per default EBGP behavior, the next-hop is changed when a route is advertised to an EBGP peer.
This means ISP-A changes the next-hop to its own IP before sending it to R3.
Thus, this statement is correct.
Final answer:
✅ B. The BGP local-preference value that is used by ISP-A is not advertised to R3.
✅ D. The next-hop value for these routes is changed by ISP-A before being sent to R3.
Verification from Juniper Documentation:
Juniper BGP Configuration Guide confirms that LOCAL_PREF is not advertised over EBGP.
RFC 4271 (BGP-4) specifies that next-hop is changed by default when advertising routes via EBGP.
NEW QUESTION # 55
Exhibit
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is true?
- A. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will only be shared if BGP is configured in the routing instance
- B. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the auto-export parameter is configured
- C. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the vrf-table-label parameter is configured.
- D. The 10.101.1 0/24 route will be shared if there are other VRFs that use the same route target community
Answer: B
Explanation:
The auto-export parameter is a routing option that allows a routing instance to share routes with other routing instances or the master routing table. The auto-export parameter automatically exports routes from one routing instance to another based on the route target communities attached to the routes. In this scenario, the
10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the auto-export parameter is configured under [edit routing-options] hierarchy level.
NEW QUESTION # 56
You have an L2VPN connecting two CEs across a provider network that runs OSPF. You have OSPF configured on both CEs.
Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
- A. OSPF neighborship is formed between the two CEs.
- B. The CE and PE OSPF areas must match.
- C. The CE and PE OSPF areas can be different.
- D. OSPF neighborship is formed between the CEs and PEs.
Answer: A,C
NEW QUESTION # 57
You must alter class-of-service values in packets on the outbound interface of an edge router.
In this scenario, which CoS component allows you to accomplish this task?
- A. rewrite rules
- B. scheduler
- C. output policer
- D. forwarding classes
Answer: A
Explanation:
Class of Service (CoS) in networking is used to manage traffic by classifying, scheduling, and sometimes modifying packets to ensure network performance and Quality of Service (QoS). Different CoS components are used to achieve these goals. Let's analyze each option to determine which CoS component allows you to alter class-of-service values on the outbound interface of an edge router.
1. **Output Policer**:
- Policing is used to control the rate of traffic sent to or from a network interface. It can drop or remark traffic that exceeds a certain rate.
- Policing is not typically used to alter CoS values but to enforce traffic limits.
2. **Scheduler**:
- A scheduler is responsible for managing the order in which packets are transmitted out of an interface based on their CoS markings. It can allocate bandwidth and prioritize traffic.
- The scheduler manages how packets are queued and sent but does not alter the CoS values of packets.
3. **Rewrite Rules**:
- Rewrite rules are used to modify the CoS values of packets, such as DSCP (Differentiated Services Code Point) or 802.1p bits, as they exit an interface.
- Rewrite rules can alter the class-of-service values in the packet headers to match the desired policies of the outbound interface.
- Therefore, rewrite rules are the correct component for altering CoS values on an outbound interface.
4. **Forwarding Classes**:
- Forwarding classes are used to categorize packets into different traffic classes within a router for QoS handling.
- They help in defining how packets should be treated by the scheduler but do not directly modify the CoS values.
**Conclusion**:
To alter class-of-service values in packets on the outbound interface of an edge router, the correct CoS component to use is:
**C. rewrite rules**
**Reference**:
- Juniper Networks Documentation on CoS: [Class of Service Overview](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/class-of-service-overview.html)
- Junos OS CoS Configuration Guide: [Rewrite Rules](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/class-of-service-rewrite-rules.html)
NEW QUESTION # 58
Exhibit
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
- A. This is an EVPN Type-2 route.
- B. The devices advertising this route into EVPN are 10 0 2 12 and 10.0.2.22.
- C. The device advertising this route into EVPN is 192.168.101.5.
- D. This route is learned through EBGP
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
This is an EVPN Type-2 route, also called a MAC/IP advertisement route, that is used to advertise host IP and MAC address information to other VTEPs in an EVPN network. The route type field in the EVPN NLRI has a value of 2, indicating a Type-2 route. The device advertising this route into EVPN is 192.168.101.5, which is the IP address of the VTEP that learned the host information from the local CE device. This IP address is carried in the MPLS label field of the route as part of the VXLAN encapsulation.
NEW QUESTION # 59
You must ensure that the VPN backbone is preferred over the back door intra-area link as long as the VPN is available.
Referring to the exhibit, which action will accomplish this task?
- A. Configure an import routing policy on the CE routers that rejects OSPF routes learned on the backup intra-area link.
- B. Enable OSPF traffic-engineering.
- C. Configure the OSPF metric on the backup intra-area link that is higher than the L3VPN link.
- D. Create an OSPF sham link between the PE routers.
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 60
Referring to the exhibit, a working L3VPN exists that connects VPN-A sites. CoS is configured correctly to match on the MPLS EXP bits of the LSP. but when traffic is sent from Site-1 to Site-2.
PE-2 is not classifying the traffic correctly.
What should you do to solve the problem?
- A. Configure VPN prefix mapping for the PE-1_to_PE-2 LSP.
- B. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-2.
- C. Set a static CoS value for the PE-1_to_PE-2 LSP.
- D. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-1.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 61
Refer to the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button.
PE-1 and PE-2 are configured with LDP-signaled pseudowires to provide connectivity between CE-1 and CE-2. You notice no connectivity exists between CE-1 and CE-2.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements describe potential causes for this fault? (Choose two.)
- A. There is no LSP configured from PE-1 to PE-2.
- B. The VC IDs are mismatched.
- C. There is no LSP configured from PE-2 to PE-1.
- D. Interface ge-0/0/0 on PE-1 is down.
Answer: B,C
NEW QUESTION # 62
Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, which path would traffic passing through R1 take to get to R4?
- A. R1 -> R2 -> R4
- B. R1 -> R3 -> R4
- C. R1 -> R2 -> R3 -> R4
- D. R1 -> R4
Answer: A
Explanation:
The OSPF cost is carried in the LSAs that are exchanged within an OSPF area. When a router calculates the cost to a destination it uses the cost of the exit interface of each router in the path to the destination.
NEW QUESTION # 63 
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
- A. The multihop configuration is used for load balancing.
- B. The multipath configuration is used for load balancing.
- C. This route is learned from two different AS numbers.
- D. This route is learned from the same AS number.
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
In the exhibit, the output of the `show route protocol bgp` command is shown for the prefix `172.16.20.4/30`.
Let's analyze the provided BGP routing table to determine which statements are correct.
1. **AS Path Analysis**:
- The AS path for the route `172.16.20.4/30` is shown as `2 I`.
- This indicates that the route was learned from AS 2 and it is an internal (iBGP) route within the same AS.
2. **Multiple Paths**:
- The route has two next-hop IP addresses: `10.0.18.2` via interface `ge-1/0/4.0` and `10.0.19.2` via interface
`ge-1/0/5.0`.
- This indicates that BGP multipath is configured, which allows multiple equal-cost paths to be used for load balancing.
- BGP multipath must be explicitly configured to use multiple paths for the same prefix.
3. **Multihop vs. Multipath**:
- **Multihop Configuration**: This is typically used for establishing BGP sessions with peers that are not directly connected. It is not related to load balancing.
- **Multipath Configuration**: This is used to enable load balancing across multiple paths for the same prefix, which is the case here.
**Conclusion**:
Given the above analysis:
- **C. This route is learned from the same AS number**: Correct. The AS path `2 I` indicates the route was learned from the same AS number (AS 2).
- **D. The multipath configuration is used for load balancing**: Correct. The presence of multiple next-hops indicates that BGP multipath is configured for load balancing.
Thus, the correct answers are:
**C. This route is learned from the same AS number.**
**D. The multipath configuration is used for load balancing.**
**References**:
- Junos OS BGP Multipath Documentation: [Junos OS BGP Multipath](https://www.juniper.net
/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/bgp-multipath.html)
- Junos OS BGP Configuration Guide: [Junos OS BGP Configuration](https://www.juniper.net/documentation
/en_US/junos/topics/concept/bgp-routing-overview.html)
NEW QUESTION # 64
Refer to the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button.
You have an OSPF environment. You have recently added a router called R4 that is directly connected to R1 and R2. You discover that R4 is only peering with R2.
Referring to the exhibit, how would you correct the peering?
- A. Change the MTU size on R1 and R2 to be 22 bytes higher than R4's MTU size.
- B. Adjust the Priority on R1 to be lower than the Priority on R4.
- C. Adjust the Dead Interval on R4 to match the Dead Interval on R1 and R2.
- D. Adjust the Hello Interval on R1 and R2 to match the Hello Interval on R4.
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 65
Refer to the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button.
After adding Customer C to your Layer 3 VPN, you must ensure that PE2 is receiving VPN routes for all customers attached to PE1, as shown in the exhibit.
Which operational command displays this information?
- A. show route table inet.0
- B. show route table bgp.l3vpn.0
- C. show route summary
- D. show route table customer-c.inet.0
Answer: B
Explanation:
Understanding the Exhibit and the Problem Statement
The diagram shows a Layer 3 VPN (L3VPN) setup where multiple customers (Customer A, B, and C) are connected across a service provider network using PE (Provider Edge) routers.
PE1 and PE2 exchange VPN routes for all customers using BGP/MPLS Layer 3 VPN (L3VPN) routing.
The question asks how to verify if PE2 is receiving VPN routes for Customer C.
Evaluating the Answer Choices
✅ B. show route table bgp.l3vpn.0 (Correct Answer)
Why?
This command shows all VPN routes stored in the BGP Layer 3 VPN table (bgp.l3vpn.0).
Since PE routers exchange VPN routes using MP-BGP, this table contains the VPN-IPv4 or VPN-IPv6 routes for all customers.
If PE2 is receiving routes from PE1 for Customer C, they will appear in bgp.l3vpn.0.
❌ A. show route table inet.0 (Incorrect)
Why?
The inet.0 table contains global unicast routes for the service provider's network.
VPN routes do not appear here because they are stored in VRF-specific tables.
This command won't help verify VPN route exchange between PE1 and PE2.
❌ C. show route table customer-c.inet.0 (Incorrect)
Why?
The table customer-c.inet.0 represents the VRF routing table for Customer C on the local PE.
It only shows locally installed routes for Customer C but does not confirm if PE2 is receiving routes from PE1.
This command is useful to check local VPN routing but not BGP route propagation.
❌ D. show route summary (Incorrect)
Why?
This command only provides a summary of route counts per protocol (BGP, OSPF, etc.).
It does not display specific VPN routes.
It is useful for general troubleshooting but doesn't confirm VPN route receipt.
Final answer: ✅ show route table bgp.l3vpn.0 (Option B)
Official Juniper Documentation Reference
Junos MPLS VPNs Configuration Guide
Juniper Documentation
"The show route table bgp.l3vpn.0 command displays all VPN-IPv4 routes learned via MP-BGP for Layer 3 VPNs."
NEW QUESTION # 66
After a recent power outage, your manager asks you to investigate ways to automatically reduce the impact caused by suboptimal routing in your OSPF and OSPFv3 network after devices reboot.
Which three configuration statements accomplish this task? (Choose three.)
- A. set protocols ospf3 overload
- B. set protocols ospf3 realm ipv4-unicast overload timeout 900
- C. set protocols ospf overload
- D. set protocols ospf overload timeout 900
- E. set protocols ospf3 overload timeout 900
Answer: B,D,E
NEW QUESTION # 67
Exhibit
You are troubleshooting the connection between AS 64496 and AS 64497 and notice that only one of the paths is being used for traffic forwarding.
Referring to the exhibit, which three actions will ensure that R1 is configured properly for load balancing BGP routes? (Choose three.)
- A. Verify that an import load balancing policy exists under protocols bgp for the received BGP routes on R1.
- B. Verify that there is a load balancing export policy under routing-options for the received BGP routes on R1.
- C. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on R1.
- D. Verify that the routing table on R1 has BGP routes for 203.0.113.128/25 with multiple next hops.
- E. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on both R2 and R3.
Answer: B,C,D
Explanation:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/bgp/topics/topic-map/load-balancing-bgp- session.html
NEW QUESTION # 68
Exhibit
Referring to the exhibit, a working L3VPN exists that connects VPN-A sites CoS is configured correctly to match on the MPLS EXP bits of the LSP, but when traffic is sent from Site-1 to Site-2, PE-2 is not classifying the traffic correctly What should you do to solve the problem?
- A. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-2
- B. Configure VPN prefix mapping for the PE-1_to_PE-2 LSP
- C. Configure the explicit-null statement on PE-1.
- D. Set a static CoS value for the PE-1_to_PE-2 LSP
Answer: C
Explanation:
The explicit-null statement enables the PE router to send an MPLS label with a value of 0 (explicit null) instead of an IP header for packets destined to the VPN customer sites. This allows the penultimate hop router (the router before the egress PE router) to preserve the EXP bits of the MPLS label and pass them to the egress PE router. The egress PE router can then use these EXP bits to classify the traffic according to the CoS policy2
. In this example, PE-1 should configure the explicit-null statement under [edit protocols mpls label-switched-path PE-1_to_PE-2] hierarchy level.
NEW QUESTION # 69
In IS-IS, which two statements are correct about the designated intermediate system (DIS) on a multi-access network segment? (Choose two)
- A. A router with a priority of 1 wins the DIS election over a router with a priority of 10.
- B. On the multi-access network, each router only forms an adjacency to the DIS.
- C. On the multi-access network, each router forms an adjacency to every other router on the segment
- D. A router with a priority of 10 wins the DIS election over a router with a priority of 1.
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Option A (Correct):
In IS-IS, the Designated Intermediate System (DIS) is elected based on the highest configured priority (as defined in Junos OS).
If priorities are equal, the router with the highest MAC address becomes the DIS.
A priority value of 10 will always override a lower priority (e.g., 1).
Reference:
Option C (Correct):
On a multi-access network (e.g., Ethernet), all IS-IS routers form adjacencies with every other router on the segment.
Unlike OSPF, IS-IS does not restrict adjacencies to only the DIS.
The DIS is responsible for creating a pseudonode LSP to represent the broadcast network, but full mesh adjacencies are maintained.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
Option B: Incorrect. Higher priority always wins the DIS election. A priority of 1 cannot override a priority of 10.
Option D: Incorrect. IS-IS routers form adjacencies with all neighbors, not just the DIS.
Key Takeaways:
DIS Election: Prioritizes highest numerical value (e.g., 10 > 1).
Adjacency Behavior: Full mesh adjacencies are maintained, unlike OSPF.
DIS Role: Primarily for generating pseudonode LSPs and optimizing flooding, not adjacency restriction.
For further details, refer to Juniper's official IS-IS documentation:
Juniper IS-IS Configuration Guide.
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/is-is/topics/concept/routing-protocol-is-is-security-designated-router-understanding.html
NEW QUESTION # 70
Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.
What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)
- A. Add the external interface prefix to the IGP routing tables
- B. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
- C. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
- D. Add the internal interface prefix to the BGP routing tables.
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
Explanation
the default behavior for iBGP is to propagate EBGP-learned prefixes without changing the next-hop. This can cause issues if the next-hop is not reachable via the IGP. One solution is to use the next-hop self command on R4, which will change the next-hop attribute to its own loopback address. This way, R5 can reach the next-hop via the IGP and install the route in its routing table.
Another solution is to add the external interface prefix (120.0.4.16/30) to the IGP routing tables of R4 and R5.
This will also make the next-hop reachable via the IGP and allow R5 to use the route. According to 2, this is a possible workaround for a pure IP network, but it may not work well for an MPLS network.
NEW QUESTION # 71
Exhibit
The environment is using BGP All devices are in the same AS with reachability redundancy Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
- A. RR2 is in an OpenConfirm State until RR1 becomes unreachable.
- B. Client1 is peered to Client2 and Client3.
- C. Peering is dynamically discovered between all devices.
- D. RR1 is peered to Client2 and RR2
Answer: D
Explanation:
BGP route reflectors are BGP routers that are allowed to ignore the IBGP loop avoidance rule and advertise IBGP learned routes to other IBGP peers under specific conditions. BGP route reflectors can reduce the number of IBGP sessions and updates in a network by eliminating the need for a full mesh of IBGP peers. BGP route reflectors can have three types of peerings:
EBGP neighbor: A BGP router that belongs to a different autonomous system (AS) than the route reflector.
IBGP client neighbor: An IBGP router that receives reflected routes from the route reflector. A client does not need to peer with other clients or non-clients.
IBGP non-client neighbor: An IBGP router that does not receive reflected routes from the route reflector. A non-client needs to peer with other non-clients and the route reflector.
In the exhibit, we can see that RR1 and RR2 are route reflectors in the same AS with reachability redundancy. They have two types of peerings: EBGP neighbors (R1 and R4) and IBGP client neighbors (Client1, Client2, and Client3). RR1 and RR2 are also peered with each other as IBGP non-client neighbors.
NEW QUESTION # 72
Exhibit
CE-1 must advertise ten subnets to PE-1 using BGP Once CE-1 starts advertising the subnets to PE-1, the BGP peering state changes to Active.
Referring to the CLI output shown in the exhibit, which statement is correct?
- A. CE-1 is advertising its entire routing table.
- B. CE-1 is unreachable
- C. CE-1 is configured with an incorrect peer AS
- D. The prefix limit has been reached on PE-1
Answer: C
Explanation:
The problem in this scenario is that CE-1 is configured with an incorrect peer AS number for its BGP session with PE-1. The CLI output shows that CE-1 is using AS 65531 as its local AS number and AS 65530 as its peer AS number. However, PE-1 is using AS 65530 as its local AS number and AS 65531 as its peer AS number. This causes a mismatch in the BGP OPEN messages and prevents the BGP session from being established. To solve this problem, CE-1 should configure its peer AS number as 65530 under [edit protocols bgp group external] hierarchy level.
NEW QUESTION # 73
Which two statements are correct about reflecting inet-vpn unicast prefixes in BGP route reflection? (Choose two.)
- A. A BGP peer does not require any configuration changes to become a route reflector client.
- B. Route reflectors do not change any existing BGP attributes by default when advertising routes.
- C. Route reflectors add their cluster ID to the AS path when readvertising client routes.
- D. Clients add their originator ID when advertising routes to their route reflector
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
Route reflection is a BGP feature that allows a router to reflect routes learned from one IBGP peer to another IBGP peer, without requiring a full-mesh IBGP topology. Route reflectors do not change any existing BGP attributes by default when advertising routes, unless explicitly configured to do so. A BGP peer does not require any configuration changes to become a route reflector client, only the route reflector needs to be configured with the client parameter under [edit protocols bgp group group-name neighbor neighbor-address] hierarchy level.
NEW QUESTION # 74
Exhibit
CE-1 and CE-2 are part of a VPLS called Customer1 No connectivity exists between CE-1 and CE-2. In the process of troubleshooting, you notice PE-1 is not learning any routes for this VPLS from PE-2, and PE-2 is not learning any routes for this VPLS from PE-1.
- A. The no-tunnel-services statement should be deleted on both PEs.
- B. The route target must match on PE-1 and PE-2.
- C. The route distinguisher must match on PE-1 and PE-2.
- D. The instance type should be changed to I2vpn.
Answer: B
Explanation:
VPLS is a technology that provides Layer 2 VPN services over an MPLS network. VPLS uses BGP as its control protocol to exchange VPN membership information between PE routers. The route target is a BGP extended community attribute that identifies which VPN a route belongs to. The route target must match on PE routers that participate in the same VPLS instance, otherwise they will not accept or advertise routes for that VPLS.
NEW QUESTION # 75
Exhibit
Referring to the exhibit, you are receiving the 192.168 0 0/16 route on both R3 and R4 from your EBGP neighbor You must ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes from the route reflector In this scenario, which BGP feature should you configure to accomplish this behavior?
- A. multihop
- B. add-path
- C. multipath
- D. route-target
Answer: B
Explanation:
BGP add-path is a feature that allows the advertisement of multiple paths through the same peering session for the same prefix without the new paths implicitly replacing any previous paths. This behavior promotes path diversity and reduces multi-exit discriminator (MED) oscillations. BGP add-path is implemented by adding a path identifier to each path in the NLRI. The path identifier can be considered as something similar to a route distinguisher in VPNs, except that a path ID can apply to any address family. Path IDs are unique to a peering session and are generated for each network3. In this question, we have a route reflector (RR) that receives two routes for the same prefix (192.168.0.0/16) from an EBGP neighbor. By default, the RR will only advertise its best path to its clients (R1 and R2). However, we want R1 and R2 to receive both routes from the RR. To achieve this, we need to configure BGP add-path on the RR and enable it to send multiple paths for the same prefix to its clients.
NEW QUESTION # 76
You want to implement the BGP Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM) on the network.
Which three statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose three.)
- A. BGP GTSM requires a TTL of 1 to be configured between neighbors.
- B. You can implement BGP GTSM between R2 and R1.
- C. BGP GTSM requires a firewall filter to discard packets with incorrect TTL.
- D. You can implement BGP GTSM between R2, R3, and R4.
- E. BGP GTSM requires a TTL of 255 to be configured between neighbors
Answer: B,C,E
Explanation:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/bgp/topics/ref/statement/multihop- edit-protocols-bgp.html
NEW QUESTION # 77
Exhibit
You are attempting to summarize routes from the 203.0.113.128/25 IP block on R8 to AS 64500. You implement the export policy shown in the exhibit and all routes from the routing table stop being advertised.
In this scenario, which two steps would you take to summarize the route in BGP? (Choose two.)
- A. Add the set protocols bgp family inet unicast add-path command to allow additional routes to the RIB tables. -
- B. Remove the from protocol bgp command from the export policy.
- C. Replace exact in the export policy with orlonger.
- D. Add the set routing-options static route 203.0.113.123/25 discard command.
Answer: B,D
NEW QUESTION # 78
......
Authentic Best resources for JN0-664 Online Practice Exam: https://passleader.testkingpdf.com/JN0-664-testking-pdf-torrent.html
